| |
ASP
Technology Provides Affordable,
Efficient Fraud Prevention Strategies
By
Jodi Pratt, Credit Union Times, October 3,
2001
Until just the last few years ago, credit unions
have seemed immune to fraud losses while other financial
institutions have been hit hard. With banks taking
a more aggressive posture against fraud and credit
unions allowing for more competitive account opening
criteria, fraud operators have taken notice. And
fraud losses for credit unions are beginning to escalate.
In the early 1990’s, taking advantage of bank’s
relaxed customer service policies, restrictive hold
regulations and inexpensive desktop publishing technology,
fraud rings realized that money was easy to get,
using check fraud. Targeting easy victims – such
as the largest banks with their many branches,
high volumes and reoccupation with acquisitions
and mergers - rings were able to develop deposit
account fraud schemes amounting to millions of
dollars in losses annually. Pickings continued
to be lucrative for nearly a decade, while the
big banks fought to catch up, developing and then
implementing fraud detection and prevention defenses.
The American Bankers Association has been tracking
check fraud losses through a bi-annual survey starting
in 1992. In all the surveys the results have shown
an increasing fraud loss trend with the largest banks
seeing the largest increase in fraud loses. Until
recently.
In the 2000 survey, community banks saw a large
leap in escalating losses, and not in any small
measure. In 1998, only 49% of community banks recognized
check related losses. In 2000, however, 67% reported
check related losses. Experts float the hypothesis
that fraud rings have been finding the large banks
more and more difficult to “hit” thanks
to aggressive prevention programs and have realized
that smaller organizations are nearly as easy to
infiltrate and, perhaps, even more vulnerable.
Why more vulnerable? While big banks have been able
to cost justify expensive software solutions that
are placed within their technology infrastructure,
smaller financial organizations, such as community
banks, have difficulty justifying that expense. Also,
larger organizations are able to provide the on-going
technology support required to maintain and periodically
update the system, while smaller organizations often
do not have that technical expertise in-house. Fraud
operators have come to realize this is a terrific
opportunity and are switching their attention.
Credit unions, being close cousins to community banks,
are likely to be included in this fraud target market,
which would account for the increase in credit union
fraud losses. Up until the last few years, the only
technologies available to provide fraud detection
products and services have been built for mainframe
or PC platforms, perfect for larger financial organizations,
but too costly for more moderately sized organizations.
Fortunately, recent advances in Internet technology
provide a platform that would allow the same successful
fraud detection methodologies to be made available
to credit unions and community banks in a much more
cost-effective manner.
As we see fraud begin to move aggressively to credit
unions and community banking, fraud protection
must be cost-effective for smaller institutions.
One innovative fraud prevention solution is ASP – Application
Service Provider – hostable technology. Forrester
Research recently reported that ASP provides the
best value for users with the benefits of systems
that incorporate state-of-the-art technology without
the need to build their own infrastructures.
This service relieves the user of investing a large,
lump sum in software and hardware acquisition costs
as well as of the cost of providing on-going technical
staff to support the technology. After a small,
one-time set up fee, charges are “pay-as-you-go” per
transaction fees. Costs can be more easily controlled
and can be expensed as regular monthly operating
expenses, just as other services are charged. Support
is usually provided through a toll-free Help Desk
when needed and providers retain the responsibility
to maintain and upgrade the technology.
Right now, ASP fraud prevention technology is targeted
at three crucial fraud prevention functions through
one website:
- New
account verification
- New
employee screening
- Loss
tracking-case management
New
account verification checks new
member information against a number
of different databases to verify
the integrity and accuracy of the
information being provided by the
potential new member.
New employee screenings perform a number of different
checks of background information to make sure applicants
are providing truthful and complete information before
they are hired.
Loss tracking and case management uses software technology
designed to support a number of different functions
that all use much of the same loss information --
risk management, security and investigations – while
maintaining all loss and case information in one
database for accurate, efficient tracking and reporting.
As ASP fraud prevention technology continues to develop,
it will focus on more transaction-oriented detection,
including deposit fraud (including ATM deposit protection),
On-Us fraud and kiting detection.
The ASP model is compelling – particularly
for credit unions – because of the following
advantages:
- Reduced
overall management and hardware
costs
- Faster
application deployment and trouble-free
upgrades
- Improved
IT department focus on value-added
projects
- Access
for anywhere, anytime, with just
an Internet connection
- Enhanced
security and redundancy
An
ASP approach provides continuous
access to fraud prevention technology
without the risks, costs and administrative
responsibilities associated with
developing and maintaining the
required Information Technology
infrastructure. ASP technology
should be offered through secured
websites using 128-bit encryption
technology. It should also offer
user-defined information access
allowing the client to set access
levels for vendors, employees and
management.
|
|