| |
SP Technology
Provides Affordable, Efficient
Fraud Prevention Strategies
By Jodi Pratt, Credit
Union Times, October 3,
2001
Until just the last few years ago, credit unions
have seemed immune to fraud losses while other financial
institutions have been hit hard. With banks taking
a more aggressive posture against fraud and credit
unions allowing for more competitive account opening
criteria, fraud operators have taken notice. And
fraud losses for credit unions are beginning to escalate.
In the early 1990’s, taking advantage of bank’s
relaxed customer service policies, restrictive hold
regulations and inexpensive desktop publishing technology,
fraud rings realized that money was easy to get,
using check fraud. Targeting easy victims – such
as the largest banks with their many branches, high
volumes and reoccupation with acquisitions and mergers
- rings were able to develop deposit account fraud
schemes amounting to millions of dollars in losses
annually. Pickings continued to be lucrative for
nearly a decade, while the big banks fought to catch
up, developing and then implementing fraud detection
and prevention defenses.
The American Bankers Association has been tracking
check fraud losses through a bi-annual survey starting
in 1992. In all the surveys the results have shown
an increasing fraud loss trend with the largest banks
seeing the largest increase in fraud loses. Until
recently.
In the 2000 survey, community banks saw a large leap
in escalating losses, and not in any small measure.
In 1998, only 49% of community banks recognized check
related losses. In 2000, however, 67% reported check
related losses. Experts float the hypothesis that
fraud rings have been finding the large banks more
and more difficult to “hit” thanks to
aggressive prevention programs and have realized
that smaller organizations are nearly as easy to
infiltrate and, perhaps, even more vulnerable.
Why more vulnerable? While big banks have been able
to cost justify expensive software solutions that
are placed within their technology infrastructure,
smaller financial organizations, such as community
banks, have difficulty justifying that expense. Also,
larger organizations are able to provide the on-going
technology support required to maintain and periodically
update the system, while smaller organizations often
do not have that technical expertise in-house. Fraud
operators have come to realize this is a terrific
opportunity and are switching their attention.
Credit unions, being close cousins to community banks,
are likely to be included in this fraud target market,
which would account for the increase in credit union
fraud losses. Up until the last few years, the only
technologies available to provide fraud detection
products and services have been built for mainframe
or PC platforms, perfect for larger financial organizations,
but too costly for more moderately sized organizations.
Fortunately, recent advances in Internet technology
provide a platform that would allow the same successful
fraud detection methodologies to be made available
to credit unions and community banks in a much more
cost-effective manner.
As we see fraud begin to move aggressively to credit
unions and community banking, fraud protection must
be cost-effective for smaller institutions. One innovative
fraud prevention solution is ASP – Application
Service Provider – hostable technology. Forrester
Research recently reported that ASP provides the
best value for users with the benefits of systems
that incorporate state-of-the-art technology without
the need to build their own infrastructures.
This service relieves the user of investing a large,
lump sum in software and hardware acquisition costs
as well as of the cost of providing on-going technical
staff to support the technology. After a small, one-time
set up fee, charges are “pay-as-you-go” per
transaction fees. Costs can be more easily controlled
and can be expensed as regular monthly operating
expenses, just as other services are charged. Support
is usually provided through a toll-free Help Desk
when needed and providers retain the responsibility
to maintain and upgrade the technology.
Right now, ASP fraud prevention technology is targeted
at three crucial fraud prevention functions through
one website:
- New account verification
- New employee screening
- Loss tracking-case management
New account verification checks
new member information against a
number of different databases to
verify the integrity and accuracy
of the information being provided
by the potential new member.
New employee screenings perform a number of different
checks of background information to make sure applicants
are providing truthful and complete information before
they are hired.
Loss tracking and case management uses software technology
designed to support a number of different functions
that all use much of the same loss information --
risk management, security and investigations – while
maintaining all loss and case information in one
database for accurate, efficient tracking and reporting.
As ASP fraud prevention technology continues to develop,
it will focus on more transaction-oriented detection,
including deposit fraud (including ATM deposit protection),
On-Us fraud and kiting detection.
The ASP model is compelling – particularly
for credit unions – because of the following
advantages:
- Reduced overall management and
hardware costs
- Faster application deployment
and trouble-free upgrades
- Improved IT department focus
on value-added projects
- Access for anywhere, anytime,
with just an Internet connection
- Enhanced security and redundancy
An ASP approach provides continuous
access to fraud prevention technology
without the risks, costs and administrative
responsibilities associated with
developing and maintaining the required
Information Technology infrastructure.
ASP technology should be offered
through secured websites using 128-bit
encryption technology. It should
also offer user-defined information
access allowing the client to set
access levels for vendors, employees
and management.
For information regarding ASP-hostable fraud prevention
strategies, please call Don Crosby, at 972.371.1439.
Bio information on Jodi Pratt:
Jodi Pratt is Managing Principal of Carreker Corporation’s
Fraud Solutions. As part of the Risk Solutions Group,
the Fraud Solutions practice includes the development,
implementation and on-going support of fraud detection
and prevention products and services. For four years
prior, Jodi ran her own consulting practice, Pratt & Associates,
which provided assistance to financial institutions,
trade association and vendors who create fraud detection
solutions; Carreker was one of her clients for the
last two years.
Ms. Pratt has more than 25 years experience in retail
banking, in a variety of operations and development
assignments. Since 1992, she has focused on fraud
control. She managed Bank of America’s National
Operating Controls – Project Management unit,
providing direction and consultation for local, interstate
and cross-divisional units and served as Executive
Vice President and Division Head for WJM Technologies.
Ms. Pratt works with national, regional and community
financial institutions on local as well as national
industry initiatives.
In the past, Ms. Pratt participated in a number of
national task forces and advisory groups, including
the ABA Check Fraud Task Force, the ANSI Sub-Committee
on Check Fraud, the Star Chek Advisory Board and
the Primary Payment Systems Steering Committee. She
has spoken nationally and internationally on the
subject of fraud and fraud detection and holds an
MBA from California State University at Hayward,
CA.
|
|